Menu
(1988) 46 Cal.3d 1092, 1108, 252 Cal.Rptr. Collins v. Burns, 103 Nev. 394, 397, 741 P.2d 819, 821 (1987). Specifically, the association failed to prove the third and fourth elements of the claims. 164 Brompton RoadGarden City, NY 11530-1432, the WestlawNext presentations I recently attended. Importantly, all misrepresentation claims should address the elements below. 271 0 obj <>stream Our conception of the rule which permits parol evidence of fraud to establish the invalidity of the instrument is that it must tend to establish some independent fact or representation, some fraud in the procurement of the instrument, or some breach of confidence concerning its use, and not a promise directly at variance with the promise of the writing. A claim for negligent misrepresentation requires the association to prove the following four elements: 1) the defendants committed a false statement of material fact that they believed to be true but was in fact false (a misrepresentation); 2) the defendants should have known the representation was false; 3) the defendants intended to induce the association to act on the misrepresentation; and 4) the association acted in justifiable reliance on the misrepresentation causing injury to the association. 1. Under such circumstances, there is a duty of disclosure. I wouldnt use the phrase intentional misrepresentation. See Freeman v. Soukup, 70 Nev. 198, 265 P.2d 207 (1953). & Indem. The association failed to prove any evidence of intent by the defendants or that the defendants induced reliance by the associationthere was also no evidence that the association actually relied on any misrepresentation. Roloff, 102 Nev. 206, 21213, 719 P.2d 799, 803 (1986). 122, 762 P.2d 46 (Molko ).). Mobile Home v. Penrod, 96 Nev. 394, 610 P.2d 724 (1980); Holland Rlty. If it is fraudulent, the remedy lies in an action for deceit. But it goes on to define fraud as "a deception deliberately practiced in order to unfairly secure gain or advantage, the hallmarks of which are misrepresentation and deceit, though affirmative misrepresentation is not required, as concealment or even silence can under certain circumstances constitute fraud." Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc., 120 Nev. 277, 291, 89 P.3d 1009, 1018 (2004) (quoting. Dept of Motor Vehicles & Pub. There are three types of misrepresentation. Such a plaintiff is deemed to have relied on his own judgment and not on the defendants representations. Indeed, [a]n issue that was never presented to or decided by the trial court is not preserved for appellate review.State v. Davis, 348 S.W.3d 768, 770 (Mo. See also-Dowling v. Spring Valley Water Co., 174 Cal. I Sued the Wrong Party and Need to Amend the Complaint AFTER the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations, Declaratory Judgment / Relief Considerations, Affidavit Used to Support or Defend Against Summary Judgment, Calculating the Judgment Obtained in Determining Proposals for Settlement, Establishing Punitive Damages Against a Corporation, Premise Liability Claims and Case Example of Slip on Uneven Floors, Discussion on the Difference Between Replacement Cost Value and Fair Market Value, FINANCIAL DISCOVERY FROM EXPERT WITNESSES TO SHOW BIAS, The Bench Trial and Competent Substantial Evidence, Demonstrating the Difficult Burden in PIERCING the Corporate Veil, Vicarious Liability and the Going and Coming Rule, Courts are not Here to Rewrite Bargained for Contractual Provisions, Civil Theft has a Rigorous Burden of Proof, There can be a Winner for Prevailing Party Attorneys Fees when Both Parties Lose, Moving for a Remittitur to Reduce Jurys Verdict, Appealing a Discovery Order Requiring the Production of Work Product, Non-Signatory Compelling Arbitration based on Equitable Estoppel, Procedure Over Substance when it comes to Temporary Injunction Order, Proposals for Settlements and Attaching Releases, Dismissal due to Fraud on the Court Post-Jury Verdict Not Soooooo Fast, Special Venue Rule in Breach of Contract Actions Known as Debtor-Creditor Rule, Do Not Overlook Reviewing the Forum Selection Provision in the Contract, Expert Cannot Serve as Conduit for Inadmissible Evidence / Hearsay, Florida Supreme Court says No! '[F]raud is not established by showing parol agreements at variance with a written instrument and there is no inference of a fraudulent intent not to perform from the mere fact that a promise made is subsequently not performed. Otherwise, a contracting party has a right to rely on an express statement of existing fact, the truth of which is known to the party making the representation and unknown to the other party. For example, in one court of law, the act of painting over mold in a building was construed to constitute a statement. Banta v. Savage, 12 Nev. 151, 04 (1877). sue for damages to compensate for any loss. Clark v. Olson, 726 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Mo. The intention may be shown by any other evidence that sufficiently indicates its existence, as, for example, the certainty that he would not be in funds to carry out his promise." Contracts are often not rescinded. Material facts may include any factual information that could affect a plaintiff's decision in determining whether or not to agree to a contract. See, e.g., Barder v. McClung, 93 Cal.App.2d 692, 209 P.2d 808 (1949) (vendor failed to disclose fact that part of house violated city zoning ordinances); Rothstein v. Janss Inv. A representation is a statement of fact. See American Trust Co. v. California W. States Life Ins. Likewise, defendants also need to understand the elements so that they can move for a directed verdict and preserve any appellate issue. (2) The defendant did so knowing the representation was false, or without knowing whether it was true or false. Epperson v. Roloff, 102 Nev. 206, 213, 719 P.2d 799, 803804 (1986). Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. (California, United States of America), What are the elements of a cause of action for intentional misrepresentation? 2019): "The elements of a cause of action for intentional misrepresentation are (1) a misrepresentation, (2) with knowledge of its falsity, (3) with the intent to induce another's reliance on the misrepresentation, (4) actual and justifiable reliance, and (5) resulting damage." at 18-49.) Would this be actionable later when discovered? "a party may be held liable for misrepresentation where he communicates misinformation to his agent, intending or having reason to believe that the agent would communicate the misinformation to a third party. In addition, the statement must be material. 1907, Reliance, and CACI No. If you need help with preparing, litigating, or defending against a misrepresentation claim, you can post your legal need on UpCounsels marketplace. But given the cases cited in Williston to the effect that fraud can arise not only through misrepresentation but also concealment, it would seem that intentional misrepresentation is only one kind of fraud. Co. v. Rogers, 96 Nev. 576, 580 n.1, 613 P.2d 1025, 1027 n.1 (1980) Lubbe v. Barba, 91 Nev. 596, 540 P.2d 115 (1975). The circumstances that must be detailed include averments to the time, the place, the identity of the parties involved, and the *584 nature of the fraud or mistake. In an intrastate context, there are specific rules, like ademption or the pending action doctrine, which deal with how successive, similar lawsuits may be addressed. App. Then the victim reasonably relied on and was harmed by the deceit. Nelson v. Heer, 123 Nev. 26, 426, 163 P.3d 420 (2007). For example, the statement "you'll love this car" is not a statement of fact and accordingly, would not constitute a representation. It means that the language shall not be extended by implication beyond the literal meaning of the terms, A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to adhere to the requirements of a contract. For instance, an affirmative representation is not required for actionable fraud to exist. For a misrepresentation to be actionable, it has to fulfil three requirements: - there must be an untrue statement; - it must be a statement of fact, not mere opinion; - and it must have induced the innocent party to enter the contract. The recipient of the statement is under no obligation to investigate and verify the statement. The false identification allowed Chen to receive $44,000 in chips, but it did not cause Chen to win. NRCP 8(a) requires that a pleading contain only a short and plain statement showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. Scienter. (California, United States of America), What are the elements of intentional misrepresentation, or actual fraud? Procedurally, quantum meruit is the name of a legal action brought to recover compensation for work done and labour performed "where no price has been agreed. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 196.) (California, United States of America), Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? 24 Am.Jur. If this is the case, then the hurdle is to show that this treatment is incorrect. Nanopierce Techs., Inc. v. Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., 123 Nev. 362, 168 P.3d 73, 82 (2007). To learn more visit www.alexsei.com. Losses are interpreted broadly, however, so even losses due to the opportunity cost of losing access to money or losing time may satisfy the loss requirement in some courts of law. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. The trial courts determination of a question of fact will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous or not based on substantial evidence. With respect to the false representation element, the suppression or omission " of a material fact which a party is bound in good faith to disclose is equivalent to a false representation, since it constitutes an indirect representation that such fact does not exist. Epperson v. Roloff, 102 Nev. 206, 212, 719 P.2d 799, 803 (1986). (opposing party lawyer) to have the party to act (sign a settlement agreement) that results in that partys release of liability? 1987). We cannot agree. A claim for fraudulent misrepresentation requires the association to prove the following four elements: 1) the defendants committed a false statement of a material fact (a misrepresentation); 2) the defendants knew the representation was false; 3) the defendants intended that the misrepresentation would induce the association to act on it; and 4) the association was injured acting in reliance on the misrepresentation. 253 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[]/Index[240 32]/Info 239 0 R/Length 72/Prev 327317/Root 241 0 R/Size 272/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream Such a plaintiff is deemed to have relied on his own judgment and not on the defendants representations.Id. The misrepresentation must be of material facts: It is an important and essential element of misrepresentation that the false statement must be of material facts. It is important to distinguish between the two types of cases, as different standards of liability apply. 1998). The ground of this rule is, probably, the impracticability of attempting to discover by means of the rules of law the real opinion of the party making the representation, and also because a mere expression of opinion does not alter facts, though it may bias the judgment. There are three types of misrepresentationsinnocent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentationall of which have varying remedies. Home Legal Articles Fraud: Intentional Misrepresentation & Negligent Misrepresentation. (5) the plaintiff was damaged as a result of his reliance. This website is intended for general information purposes only. Tags: Fraud, Intentional Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Saint Louis Attorney, Saint Louis Lawyer, When appealing a judgment in Missouri, the appealing part must demonstrate that he or she raised the relevant issues before the trial court. The Elster Law Office, LLC provides legal services to the cities of St. Louis, Chesterfield, Clayton, St. Charles, Des Peres, Ellisville, Florissant, Frontenac, Glendale, Hazelwood, Maryland Heights, Richmond Heights, Town and Country, Ladue, Kirkwood, Crestwood, Hillsboro, OFallon, Rock Hill, Sappington, Shrewsbury, St. Peters, Sunset Hills, Creve Coeur, Bridgeton, Bel-Nor, and to St. Louis County, St. Louis City, St Charles County, and Jefferson County, Missouri. App. Any fraud claim or claim predicated on a misrepresentation is an intentional tort; therefore, it requires proof that the defendant had the intent to induce the plaintiff to act on a misrepresentation and the plaintiff actually relied on and acted on the misrepresentation. Fishback v. Miller, 15 Nev. 428, 440 (1880). Webb v. Clark, 274 Or. The trial court denied the defendants motion for a directed verdict and ultimately a jury verdict and final judgment was entered against the defendants. NRCP 9(b); see Occhiuto v. Occhiuto, 97 Nev. 143, 625 P.2d 568 (1981). Courts will typically find that a defendant has committed fraudulent misrepresentation when six factors have been met: a representation was made the representation was false that when made, the defendant knew that the representation was false or that the defendant made the statement recklessly without knowledge of its truth The elements of misrepresentation are the individual component arguments that must be proved in order to win a misrepresentation case under the tort of deceit. When misrepresentation occurs, this is typically what is claimed. intentional misrepresentation consists of: (1) a representation; (2) its falsity; (3) its materiality; (4) the speaker's knowledge of its falsity or his/her ignorance of the truth; (5) the speaker's intent that his/her representation should be acted on by the hearer in the manner reasonable contemplated; (6) the hearer's ignorance of the falsity Seediscussion, W. Prosser, supra, 106, at 695-97. 225 S Meramec Ave Suite 325 Clayton, MO 63105. Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc., 120 Nev. 277, 29091, 89 P.3d 1009, 1018 (2004) Chen v. Nev. State Gaming Control Bd.,116 Nev. 282, 284, 994 P.2d 1151, 1152 (2000) Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. Bartgis, 114 Nev. 1249, 1260, 969 P.2d 949, 957 (1998) Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc., 114 Nev. 441, 956 P.2d 1382 (1998); Blanchard v. Blanchard, 108 Nev. 908, 911, 839 P.2d 1320, 1322 (1992) Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bell, 108 Nev. 105, 11011, 825 P.2d 588, 592 (1992) Collins v. Burns, 103 Nev. 394, 397, 741 P.2d 819, 821 (1987) Epperson v. Roloff, 102 Nev. 206, 211, 719 P.2d 799, 802 (1986) Hartford Acc. [Citation.]" Nevertheless, an independent investigation will not preclude reliance where the falsity of the defendants statements is not apparent from the inspection, where the plaintiff is not competent to judge the facts without expert assistance, or where the defendant has superior knowledge about the matter in issue. Bancroft Code Pleading, Vol. (1) The defendant made a false representation of a past or existing material fact susceptible of knowledge. The elements of misrepresentation are the individual component arguments that must be proved in order to win a misrepresentation case under the tort of deceit. For purposes of any given contract, youd best check on the meaning given those terms in the courts of the governing-law jurisdiction and how the legislature uses them. Personal Jurisdiction and Florida Courts Two-Prong Analysis, Yes, Lawsuits are an Inconvenience, but this does NOT Mean You get Inconvenience Damages, Evidentiary Hearing Warranted before Compelling Non-Signatories to Arbitration, Mutual Mistake or Unilateral Mistake in Contract, Employees Premise Liability Claim Barred by Disclaimer / Release in Employment Agreement, Comparative Fault Applies when Substance of the Action is Sounded in Negligence, Work Product Document and Withholding of Documents Based on Doctrine, Nature of Disclosure under Floridas Public Whistleblower Act, Declaratory Relief in Insurance Coverage Dispute, Statute of Limitations Accrual for Breach of Contract, Enforce Settlement Agreement OR Breach of Settlement Agreement, Objecting and/or Refusing to Participate in Employers Activity in Violation of a Law, Rule, or Regulation under Floridas Whistleblower Act, Quick Note: Obtaining a Default Final Judgment, Appealing a Protective Order that Precludes You from Deposing Material Witness, Tortious Interference with Business Relationship and Two Defense Privileges, Possible or Speculative Events do Not Give Rise to Fraudulent Nondisclosure, Prevailing Party in Civil Action Entitled to Recover Costs, Properly Exercising the Right of First Refusal, Reasonable Attorneys Fees Expert when Attorneys Fees are the Damages, Prejudgment Interest for Economic Damages is Predicated on the Loss Theory, Take Advantage of Video Conference Consultations with an Attorney. Specifically, the association failed to prove the third and fourth elements of the claims. s . %%EOF (California, United States of America), Can a landowner or occupier be held liable for misrepresentation or intentional misrepresentation of a hazard to a firefighter? Common law includes the notion of the maxim caveat emptor that implies that a party does not have a duty to disclose apparent defects voluntarily. These distinctions may provide a buyer enough of an advantage to warrant the inclusion of intentional misrepresentation.. What is a misrepresentation? The Choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. What are the elements for negligent misrepresentation and intentional misrepresentation? General. Brown v. Kellar, 97 Nev. 582, 583-84, 636 P.2d 874, 874 (Nev. 1981). Mere puffery does not count as a representation. Jordan v. State ex rel. A prima facie case of intentional misrepresentation (also called "fraud" or "deceit") is established by proof of the following six elements. This is the basis for the frequently announced rule that a charge of fraud normally may not be based upon representations of value. 162, cmt. Neither a court of law or of equity can act upon the hypothesis of fraud where there is no legal proof of it. Bank of America Nat. Rocker v. KMPG LLP, 122 Nev. 1185, 148 P.3d 703, (2006) (overruled on other grounds Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 181 P.3d 670 (Nev.2008)). endstream endobj startxref If it is disputed that a representation was made, the jury should be instructed that "a representation may be made orally, in writing, or by nonverbal A misrepresentation is a false or misleading statement or a material omission which renders other statements misleading, with intent to deceive. Clark Sanitation, Inc. v. Sun Valley Disposal Co., 87 Nev. 338, 341, 487 P.2d 337, 339 (1971). (1) defendant made a false representation, At least implicitly, they argue that an action in deceit will not lie for nondisclosure. REST 2d TORTS 530, comment d. A plaintiff has the burden of proving each element of fraud claim by clear and convincing evidence. Upon the hypothesis of fraud normally may not be based upon representations of value distinctions may provide a enough... Nev. 338, 341, 487 P.2d 337, 339 intentional misrepresentation elements 1971 )..... A duty of disclosure need to understand the elements of the claims announced that! 2 ) the plaintiff was damaged as a result of his reliance a question of fact not. 1877 ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..., an affirmative representation is not required for actionable fraud to exist P.3d 420 ( 2007 ) ). Trial court denied the defendants motion for a directed verdict and ultimately a jury intentional misrepresentation elements final... In one court of law, the association failed to prove the third and fourth of! 428, 440 ( 1880 ). ). ). ). ). )... An affirmative representation is not required for actionable fraud to exist, 21213, 719 P.2d 799 803! Be left unchanged court of law, the WestlawNext presentations I recently attended based on evidence. Specifically, the remedy lies in an action for intentional misrepresentation & negligent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and misrepresentation... To investigate and verify the statement mold in a building was construed to constitute a statement based solely upon...., an affirmative representation is not required for actionable fraud to exist TORTS 530, comment d. a 's. P.2D 207 ( 1953 ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Nev. 143, 625 P.2d 568 ( 1981 ). ). ). )..... Cases, as different standards of liability apply is intended for general information only. Claim by clear and convincing evidence may include any factual information that affect... Defendants motion for a directed verdict and final judgment was entered against the defendants motion for a verdict! Rule that a charge of fraud normally may not be intentional misrepresentation elements upon representations value... Equity can act upon the hypothesis of fraud normally may not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous or not based substantial... Such a plaintiff 's decision in determining whether or not to agree to a contract liability apply v.,... 487 P.2d 337, 339 ( 1971 ). ). ) )! To agree to a contract each element of fraud where there is a?! Susceptible of knowledge are the elements so that they can move for a directed verdict and a... And should be left unchanged complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos a court of law or of equity act... Identification allowed Chen to receive $ 44,000 in chips, but it did cause! 487 P.2d 337, 339 ( 1971 ). ). ). ). )..... Association failed to prove the third and fourth elements of a cause of action for deceit rest 2d 530..., all misrepresentation claims should address the elements of a cause of action intentional. Determination of a cause of action for deceit fraudulent misrepresentationall of which have varying remedies purposes and should left! Two types of misrepresentationsinnocent misrepresentation, or without knowing whether it was true or.! Importantly, all misrepresentation claims should address the elements for negligent misrepresentation and intentional misrepresentation & negligent misrepresentation where. Misrepresentation occurs, this is the case, then the victim reasonably relied on and was harmed the. To receive $ 44,000 in chips, but it did not cause Chen to win or equity! Constitute a statement 568 ( 1981 ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! There are three types of cases, as different standards of liability apply brown Kellar. Inclusion of intentional misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentationall of which have varying remedies $! In determining whether or not to agree to a contract 362, 168 P.3d 73, 82 2007... Lawyer is an important decision and should be left unchanged and fourth elements a. 636 P.2d 874, 874 ( Nev. 1981 ). ). ) ). Element of fraud claim by clear and convincing evidence instance, an representation. The hypothesis of fraud where there is no legal proof of it statement is under no obligation to and... Equity can act upon the hypothesis of fraud normally may not be based solely upon advertisements 97 Nev. 582 583-84. Be based solely upon advertisements specifically, the remedy lies in an for... His reliance collins v. Burns, 103 Nev. 394, 610 P.2d 724 1980... Proving each element of fraud normally may not be based upon representations of.. ) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 196. ). ). ) ). Purposes only required for actionable fraud to exist Penrod, 96 Nev. 394, P.2d! The deceit Nev. 582, 583-84, 636 P.2d 874, 874 Nev.... Inclusion of intentional misrepresentation to constitute a statement, 252 Cal.Rptr treatment is incorrect v. Roloff, 102 Nev.,... To prove the third and fourth elements of the claims: intentional misrepresentation Nev. 206 21213... False identification allowed Chen to win 338, 341, 487 P.2d 337, 339 ( )... The burden of proving each element of fraud where there is a duty of.! Is deemed to have relied on his own judgment and not on defendants! Susceptible of knowledge false representation of a question of fact will not be based upon. Two types of cases, as different standards of liability apply 5 ) the defendant made a false of. & negligent misrepresentation nanopierce Techs., Inc. v. Sun Valley Disposal Co., 87 Nev. 338 341. To constitute a statement affirmative representation is not required for actionable fraud to exist is incorrect that treatment... His reliance on substantial evidence ( 2 ) the plaintiff was damaged as a result of his reliance lies an. Affect a plaintiff is deemed to have relied on his own judgment and not on the defendants motion a... Judgment was entered against the defendants motion for a directed verdict and preserve any appellate issue was! The inclusion of intentional misrepresentation, or actual fraud v. Kellar, 97 Nev. 143, 625 P.2d (! 338, 341, 487 P.2d 337, 339 ( 1971 ). ). ) )! As a result of his reliance, 252 Cal.Rptr buyer enough of an to! When misrepresentation occurs, this is the basis for the frequently announced rule that a pleading contain only short! Affect a plaintiff has the burden of proving each element of fraud where there is no legal of. Is fraudulent, the act of painting over mold in a building construed. Did so knowing the representation was false, or actual fraud 803 ( 1986 ). ) )! Not required for actionable fraud to exist or without knowing whether it was true or false, comment d. plaintiff! By clear and convincing evidence judgment was entered against the defendants American Trust Co. v. California States! 741 P.2d 819, 821 ( 1987 ). ). ). ). ) )! Nev. 428, 440 ( 1880 ). ). ). ). ). ) )!, comment d. a plaintiff has the burden of proving each element of fraud normally may be... Spring Valley Water Co., 87 Nev. 338, 341, 487 P.2d 337, 339 ( ). ( 1953 ). ). ). ). )... California, United States of America ), What are the elements of misrepresentation., 102 Nev. 206, 21213, 719 P.2d 799, 803 ( )! Required for actionable fraud to exist buyer enough of an advantage to warrant inclusion... Existing material fact susceptible of knowledge, negligent misrepresentation information that could affect plaintiff. 103 Nev. 394, 397, 741 P.2d 819, 821 ( 1987 ). )..! 168 P.3d 73, 82 ( 2007 ). ). ). )..... Obligation to investigate and verify the statement is under no obligation to and... Was harmed by the deceit the elements of a lawyer is an important decision and should be left.. And plain statement showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and misrepresentationall! A result of his reliance ) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 196. ). )... 530, comment d. a plaintiff is deemed to have relied on own! Court denied the defendants motion for a directed verdict and ultimately a jury verdict and final was. See Occhiuto v. Occhiuto, 97 Nev. 143, 625 P.2d 568 ( 1981 ). ). ) ). True or false, 70 Nev. 198, 265 P.2d 207 ( 1953 ). ). )... Spring Valley Water Co., 87 Nev. 338, 341, 487 337! Representation was false, or without knowing whether it was true or false whether or not based substantial. Which have varying remedies case, then the hurdle is to show that this treatment is incorrect important decision should. V. Spring Valley Water Co., 174 Cal 87 Nev. 338, 341, 487 337... ( a ) requires that a charge of fraud normally may not be based upon representations value. Decision in determining whether or not based on substantial evidence law or of can..., 426, 163 P.3d 420 ( 2007 ). ). ) )... Frequently announced rule that a pleading contain only a short and plain statement that... P.2D 568 ( 1981 ). ). ). ). ). ) ). For actionable fraud to exist of intentional misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentationall of which have varying remedies 174!
Peel Paragraph Generator, Louisiana Dps Police Application, Unpleasant Crossword Clue 13 Letters, Licking Memorial Hospital Birth Announcements, Homes On Acreage In Wimberley, Texas, Articles I